Image: image text.
Reporting science responsibly – covering controversies
- All around us we see how much easier life has become due to science
By: Charles Wendo
In this blog, we take a look at the importance of reporting science responsibly – covering controversies. Firstly, I will recap on reporting science responsibly. And then, secondly, review covering controversies in science.
It is vital that journalists and scientists focus on responsible science reporting. Science stories provide people with credible information to help them make informed decisions. This includes people like decision-makers. They often rely on the media to help them know about scientific developments of interest to the public.
Good science journalism delivers credible information. It helps society understand complex scientific issues that affect them. For example, take the COVID-19 pandemic and vaccinations. Responsible science journalism also monitors and exposes hidden information. It helps others understand people’s conduct. It helps to explain controversial subjects.
Reporting science responsibly and ethical principles
As I pointed out in my previous blog, reporting science responsibly is essential. And it must be guided by ethical principles. Ethics – deciding and then doing what’s right – is the foundation of responsible science reporting. However, what do you do when controversial topics must be addressed? You must know how to cover heated public discussions on scientific issues Moreover, you must know the right course of action to take and when to take it.
Reporting science responsibly and covering controversies
To start, let us look at covering controversies in science as this can be tricky for new journalists. Scientific controversy is a prolonged disagreement among scientists over scientific knowledge. The media love controversy. But if a controversy is not reported accurately and responsibly, the story might cause more harm than good.
Covering controversies in science – what are they?
In a nutshell, scientific controversy is a prolonged disagreement among scientists over scientific knowledge.
There are many forms of scientific disagreement. It could be an opposition to technology that cannot be proven 100% safe (technology rarely can). It might be disagreements over the nature of research. Or it could be about scientific evidence or the application of research findings. It might even be the refusal to acknowledge evidence due to vested interests.
Risks and covering controversies in science
When reporting science responsibly, it is important to remember this point. There are risks associated with handling controversies.
Controversial issues in science may distort communication with the public. They might undermine people’s trust in science. Furthermore, they can make it difficult for journalists to understand the issue being discussed. Or they can make it challenging to write a clear message for your audience. For this reason, you can easily end up writing a misleading story.
Covering controversies for reporting science responsibly
Climate change, genetic engineering, vaccines. These are important subjects that can be controversial. Remember to balance the public’s right to know and the risk of causing more confusion.
Remember that you need to reach a balance. Weigh the public’s right to know about a scientific issue and the risk of causing more confusion. You do not necessarily need to report on an issue just because other journalists are covering it. Your reporting must respect all legitimate voices. Give airtime to the appropriate views. But avoid false balance for example giving the same amount of space to a lay activist to oppose the information provided by a credible expert. Your story should always lead people to a point where they can make an informed decision.
Covering controversies – key points
In conclusion, when covering controversies, remember these key points:
- Respect all legitimate voices
- Go with the scientific consensus
- Avoid false balance
- Report scientific uncertainty accurately
- Be wary of studies that have not been peer-reviewed
- Focus on scientific evidence rather than politics
- Don’t take sides
If you missed my earlier blog, head on over now. Reporting science responsibly – ethical principles. I encourage you to read the blog and download our free science communication book. Reporting science can feel daunting. But with theory and practical exercises, the book will help encourage you to take the first step.
Download the book
Read Science Communication Skills for Journalists by Dr Charles Wendo.
This book covers a full range of science communication skills. It provides theory and hands-on guidance. See the book for examples, learning activities, graded and ungraded quizzes to facilitate learning.
To learn more about reporting science responsibly as a journalist, see Script.