Image: Science Journalism Workshop, Tanzania ©Saburi Ismail Seif

23/06/25

Script Practical Guide

Making Research Findings Interesting to the Media, Policymakers and the Public

Speed read

  • Grab media, public and policymaker attention by making your research relevant and engaging.
  • Show the real-world value of your findings by clearly communicating their social relevance.
  • Apply five proven strategies to make your research stand out and drive meaningful impact.

By: Charles Wendo

As a researcher, you naturally want your work to have a positive impact on society. You want policymakers to use your findings to shape or improve policies. You want the public to make better decisions — both personal and communal — based on your work. And you want the media to amplify your message so it reaches those audiences.

But here’s the catch: people won’t automatically pay attention to your research just because it’s important or scientifically sound. They’ll only engage with it if it resonates with their needs, interests or concerns. Even then, they’re most likely to remember what connects directly with their lives.

So how do you make sure your research gets noticed and acted upon by the media, policymakers, and the public? This guide offers practical strategies and tested techniques for communicating your findings in ways that grab attention, spark interest and drive action.

Start with societal relevance

Are people even interested in scientific research?

It depends.

Most people — including policymakers and media editors — will care about scientific findings only if the findings address something they care about or are currently facing. Your job as a communicator is to make that connection clear.

Why societal relevance matters

People are more likely to engage with research that meets their needs, solves their problems or touches their emotions. The more socially relevant your work is, the easier it becomes to get the media, policymakers and the public interested.

A personal story: water hyacinth and the power of relevance

My first media article as a science communicator wasn’t about a ground-breaking lab experiment. It was about water hyacinth — an invasive weed choking Lake Victoria. At the time, this weed was disrupting transport, fishing and tourism. Virtually everyone was talking about it.

At that time, I came across scientific research findings from other countries showing that water hyacinth could be used as livestock feed. I wrote an article based on these findings. Without any lobbying, the New Vision newspaper published it immediately. Why? Because it was relevant. It addressed a current problem, offered a potential solution and added a fresh perspective to a widely discussed issue.

Why did the media love this article?

Here’s what made the article attractive to both editors and the public:

  • Relevance – Water hyacinth was a national concern.
  • Timing – The issue was widely talked about at that time.
  • Simplicity – The language was clear and accessible.
  • Credibility – The information was based on credible research studies.
  • Fresh angle – It presented the weed not as a nuisance but as a potential resource.


Reflect on your research

Does your research have a societal impact? In other words, does it clearly benefit individuals, organisations, or nations?

Ask yourself:

  • Can your research help solve any current or pressing societal problem?
  • If yes, have you made efforts to let the public and policymakers know that your research can help them solve their pressing problems?
  • Have you built relationships with people who might use or promote your findings to the public and policymakers?

If your answer to all the above questions is “yes,” then you’re on the path to relevance and impact. Research findings are more likely to be taken up — and acted upon — if they are clearly relevant and the relevance is communicated effectively.

If your answer to any of the questions is “no,” you might be missing valuable opportunities to make a difference.

Techniques for making research interesting

In today’s information-rich world, everyone — especially media editors and policymakers — is bombarded with content. Your research is just one of many things competing for people’s attention.

The key is to make your information stand out. Many researchers assume that people don’t care about science, when in fact the issue is often how the information is presented. Here are five powerful techniques to help your research cut through the noise.

Technique 1: Highlight what the public cares about

Not all research is equally compelling to the public. The trick is to identify what matters most to your audience. As pointed out by Etienne Toussaint, a Professor of Law at the University of South Carolina in USA, if researchers can tie their research to everyday experiences or cultural trends, their work is more likely to resonate with wider audiences.

Media professionals use a set of criteria — called news values — to decide which stories are worth sharing with the public. You can use these same criteria to predict what the public and policymakers will be interested in.

Novelty: Is the information new or surprising?

Timeliness: Is it relevant at this time?

Impact: How many people are affected, and how deeply?

Proximity: Is it happening close to home, or does it relate to people’s daily lives?

Unusualness: Is there something striking or unexpected about your findings?

Prominence: Does it involve influential people, places or organisations?

Conflict/Controversy: Are there debates or opposing views?

Example:

Which of these statements would grab more attention from African policymakers?

a) Scientists have mapped the genome of malaria parasites.

b) Malaria is becoming resistant to Africa’s frontline drug.

Answer: The second. It speaks directly to a real, urgent and potentially dangerous situation that can affect people.

Technique 2: Look for a window of opportunity

Timing is everything. People pay attention when your research aligns with what they’re already thinking about at that time.

For instance, when wheat prices rose in Africa due to the Russia-Ukraine war, Uganda’s president controversially suggested people should eat cassava instead of bread. Cassava suddenly became a trending topic. Agricultural researchers jumped on this moment to share relevant findings about cassava.

What creates a window of opportunity? Below are some examples.

  • Major policy pronouncements
  • Trending news stories
  • Viral social media posts
  • Natural disasters or disease outbreaks
  • International days (e.g., World Food Day)
  • Parliamentary debates or national campaigns

Tip: Even if your research isn’t brand new, timing its release with a relevant event can make it newsworthy.

Technique 3: Humanise your research

People care about people. Human stories tend to move people more than data does. Even the most technical research becomes more engaging when it’s connected to real human experiences.

How to humanise your research:

  • Tell the real-life story of a person or community affected by the problem you are researching (with their consent).
  • Describe how a community has benefited from your work.
  • Include voices of policymakers, service users, or local leaders.
  • Share your personal story as a researcher — for example, exciting experiences or challenges you faced.
  • Highlight someone influential who supports your work.


Technique 4: Relate your findings to people’s needs and aspirations

Facts alone don’t move people — goals do. Policymakers and the public are driven by hopes like reducing poverty, creating jobs, improving health and increasing food security.

So, don’t just talk about a nitrogen-efficient variety of maize. Instead, describe it as a maize variety that requires less fertilizer, saves farmers money, and improves food security. Mentioning food security and cost savings is more likely to catch the attention of both farmers and policymakers. In contrast, they might not be particularly interested in nitrogen efficiency.

Ask yourself the following questions:

  • How does this research finding affect people’s lives?
  • What new choices or decisions might it inspire?
  • What positive change should result?


Technique 5: Answer the questions people are already asking

People typically want to know:

  • Why should I care?
  • How does this affect me?
  • What can I do about it?

Make sure every piece of communication — whether it’s a press release, policy brief, op-ed, or presentation — addresses these questions early and clearly.

Avoid overly technical language. Explain the problem, the evidence, and the possible solutions in accessible terms. (See the practical guide on simplifying scientific information).


Technique 6: Use catchy images

Take a look at the front page of any magazine or newspaper, or the homepage of a news website. What catches your attention first — the text, the headline, or the picture? For most people, it’s the picture, followed by the headline. At a glance, people are more drawn to images than to text.

Using catchy and informative photos, videos, infographics, and sketches is a powerful way to not only attract attention but also help people understand and remember scientific information. An image can spark curiosity and make someone want to learn more —prompting them to read your text.

In a popular article, Felice Frankel, a science photographer and research scientist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), explains that science images can capture attention in ways that words alone cannot.

As a researcher, you need to recognize that humans are visual creatures — and use that to enhance your science communication. Think about your study from the outset and identify moments that can offer opportunities to capture eye-catching pictures. For example, a chemistry experiment with a colorful reaction, a field activity in a beautiful crop garden, or someone operating an intriguing piece of scientific equipment. Such images can capture the interest of policymakers, the media, and the public.

You can also consider creating infovideos or visualizing your data to make your findings more engaging and accessible.

In summary

Let’s recap the core strategies:

  • Start with social relevance: Make sure your work addresses real-life problems.
  • Use news values: Frame your findings to attract attention.
  • Time it right: Align your message with trending issues or events.
  • Make it human: Tell stories about people, not just data.
  • Show the impact: Help people understand why it matters and what they can do.
  • Visual appeal: Use catchy images – photos, vidoes, infographics and sketches.


Your next step

Reflect on your current research and identify:

  • The societal problem it addresses
  • Who benefits from it
  • The news values it meets
  • A timely moment to share it
  • A human story to highlight
  • The public aspiration it supports


Then craft your message — whether it’s a tweet thread, short video, media article or policy brief. But whatever you do, make it interesting. That’s how you move from publishing to impacting.

About the author

Charles Wendo is a veterinary doctor, science journalist, and science communication trainer with over 20 years of experience. He trains researchers and journalists across Africa and beyond, helping them translate complex scientific information into compelling stories for the media, policymakers and the public.


You might also like


References

Frankel, F., 2019. Science images can capture attention and pique curiosity in a way words alone can’t. The Conversation. [online] 2 May. Available at: https://theconversation.com/science-images-can-capture-attention-and-pique-curiosity-in-a-way-words-alone-cant-115286 [Accessed 20 May 2025].

Toussaint, E., 2025. How to make your research resonate with everyday life. [LinkedIn] 28 March. Available at: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/triggers-how-make-your-research-resonate-everyday-life-toussaint-rewie/ [Accessed 20 May 2025].

UK Research and Innovation (UKRI), n.d. Defining impact. [online] UKRI. Available at: https://www.ukri.org/councils/esrc/impact-toolkit-for-economic-and-social-sciences/defining-impact/ [Accessed 20 May 2025].

Wendo, C., 1996. Is water hyacinth God given or Satanic sent? New Vision, 6 March, p.19.